Why Did Paramount Pay $150 Million for a Valued $20 Million Media Company?

Logos representing Paramount Purchase of The Free Press.

A Bold Move in Media Acquisitions

When Paramount made the decision to purchase The Free Press for a striking $150 million, it raised eyebrows across the media landscape. This startup, generating only about $20 million in revenue, seems, on the surface, like an unusual target for such a hefty investment. Paramount is paying an astounding 7.5 times revenue—far higher than the typical multiples in the industry, which generally hover around five to 15 times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA).

Readying for Growth

However, the purchase is less about immediate financial returns and more about strategic positioning. Analysts indicate that Paramount sees value in The Free Press's brand, talent, and future growth potential, especially when integrated within CBS News. This kind of foresight is necessary in today’s evolving media landscape, where traditional advertising revenue streams are shrinking

Shaping the Future of News

The acquisition also signals a shift in strategy for Paramount, focusing on digital-first, direct-to-consumer news brands. With key players like Bari Weiss at the helm, The Free Press can leverage its existing audience and entice new subscribers, creating a more predictable revenue model that is increasingly attractive to investors.

Conclusion: Cultural Reset

Ultimately, this acquisition represents more than just a financial transaction; it represents a cultural reset for CBS News. With new leadership and a fresh editorial identity brought in by Weiss, Paramount is investing not just in The Free Press's audience, but also in the significant potential to reshape news media as we know it.

Success Stories

15 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

Related Posts All Posts

01.17.2026

Honoring John Gentry: His Impact on Adtech and Human Connections

Update Remembering a Trailblazer: John Gentry's Legacy in AdTech John Gentry, the CEO of OpenX, a pioneer in the adtech industry, has passed away after a courageous battle with cancer at age 58. His life and career have left a significant imprint on the world of advertising and technology, reflecting both professional success and profound personal connections. As Gentry noted in his poignant final message on LinkedIn, he recognized that he lived a full life filled with meaningful relationships, and that legacy will endure among those he touched. A Visionary Leader in AdTech At OpenX, Gentry was credited with steering the company through the rapidly changing digital advertising landscape. His role was instrumental in the development of header bidding and the advancement of supply-side identity technology, innovations that shaped the industry. Colleagues commend him not just for his business acumen but also for his personal touch. Matt Sattel, OpenX's president, reflected that Gentry was both a mentor and a friend, showing how leadership can intertwine with humanity. Building Relationships: A Reflection on Impact Gentry's approach to leadership was about more than just results; it was about fostering authentic relationships. Chris Gaglia, a former employee, shared how Gentry's initial hesitance to hire him due to concerns over his surfer lifestyle quickly transformed into a strong bond built on shared interests. These stories resonate across the industry, illustrating how personal connections drive innovation and productivity. The Future of AdTech Without Him As the industry navigates challenges such as evolving privacy regulations and competition from major players like Google, the absence of Gentry’s guidance presents a significant gap. Leaders in advertising must now think about how to carry on his legacy, balancing business needs with a people-first approach. Gentry’s vision for merging ethical leadership with strategic insights sets a standard that the industry should strive to uphold. Conclusion: A Call to Remember and Inspire In remembering John Gentry, it’s essential not only to honor his accomplishments but also to inspire others to embody his values. Consider how you can foster meaningful relationships in your professional life, whether in tech or any other field. His legacy challenges us to blend ambition with empathy, a reminder that success is best when shared with others.

01.16.2026

EDO Found Liable for Contract Breach: Implications for Ad Tech Innovators

Update EDO Found Liable in Contract Breach Against Rival iSpot In a significant blow for EDO, a federal jury has ruled the advertising technology firm, which boasts of notable backing from actor Edward Norton, liable for breaching its contract with rival company iSpot. This ruling resulted in a hefty $18.3 million damages award to iSpot, although the company initially sought up to $47 million. The jury's verdict, delivered on Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, centered around EDO's alleged misuse of iSpot's TV ad airings data. EDO co-founder Edward Norton, while not personally implicated in the lawsuit, has actively represented EDO and its interests over the years. The Heart of the Dispute: Misappropriation of Data At the heart of iSpot's allegations were claims that EDO exploited its proprietary data under the guise of using it solely for box office analyses. However, the company accused EDO of scraping sensitive data across multiple industries without authorization and leveraging it to build a competitive analytics platform launched in 2020. This breach not only undermined iSpot’s business model but raised essential questions about data integrity in the rapidly evolving ad tech landscape. Why This Decision Matters This ruling highlights the critical role of transparency and trust in the ad tech industry—principles that both companies claim to uphold. As EDO winds up to appeal the decision, it sparks a conversation about fair practices and competitive dynamics in the tech marketplace, where allegations of data theft have become increasingly common. The Future of Ad Tech Post-Trial The implications of this ruling extend beyond the courtroom, reflecting broader shifts in advertising methodologies and viewer behavior. As consumers shift away from traditional viewing platforms towards streaming services, companies like iSpot and EDO are racing to refine their analytics capabilities. With various industry players chasing similar goals amidst fierce competition, maintaining ethical standards will be crucial in fostering consumer trust and successful business strategies. Conclusion: The Road Ahead for EDO As the appeal process unfolds, the case serves as a reminder that innovation should come from integrity and respect for intellectual property. For EDO, the challenge will be not just reversing the judgment but also reclaiming its reputation in a volatile landscape filled with both opportunities and challenges.

01.15.2026

Could Betting on Everything Change How We View Prediction Markets?

Update Prediction Markets: A Revolutionary Shift in GamblingRecently, a wave of premium publishers has partnered with Kalshi and Polymarket, the giants in the prediction markets arena. These platforms allow users to wager on numerous events, from the outcome of the Oscars to complex geopolitical questions. The allure lies in the potential for significant data insights and the ability to bet not just on sports but on practically anything. This vast expansion echoes trends seen in traditional gambling, but with a modern twist—what if you could gamble on every conceivable outcome?The Implications of a Growing MarketThe world of prediction markets is booming. As of 2025, trading volumes have soared past $2 billion weekly, a clear indication of shifting consumer interests. This growth is not just a trend; it signifies a fundamental change in how people engage with information and risk assessment. While companies like DraftKings and FanDuel have laid the groundwork for sports betting, Kalshi and Polymarket are pioneering a new category that merges finance and entertainment.Regulatory Challenges AheadHowever, the rise of prediction markets does not come without challenges. The regulatory environment remains murky, with federal oversight from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) mismatched against state-level gaming laws. Kalshi, for instance, has adopted a regulation-first model, ensuring compliance with federal regulations. Conversely, Polymarket, which originated as decentralized, faces hurdles as it seeks U.S. market reentry. The ongoing legal battles illustrate how critical it is for operators in this space to navigate the complexities of both federal and state laws effectively.Looking Towards the FutureAs prediction markets gain traction, the landscape is set to evolve. Development will likely include more comprehensive frameworks that define the legality of such markets, potential new entrants, and the need for adaptive strategies to remain compliant. For those empowered by data and technology in today’s age, understanding these dynamics will offer a competitive edge in this burgeoning field.Stay InformedAs the industry continues to mature, staying informed about regulations and market dynamics will be key for both consumers and operators. Engaging with these advancements presents an opportunity for innovation and efficiency in the ever-expanding world of prediction markets.

Why Did Paramount Pay $150 Million for a Valued $20 Million Media Company?

A Bold Move in Media Acquisitions

Readying for Growth

Shaping the Future of News

Conclusion: Cultural Reset

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title